New Book Exposes Cover-Up of Asbestos in Talc Products

August 14, 2025

New Book Exposes Cover-Up of Asbestos in Talc Products

A new book is pulling back the curtain on one of the most disturbing product liability stories in recent memory. No More Tears: The Dark Secrets of Johnson & Johnson, by investigative journalist Gardiner Harris, lays out how one of America’s most iconic brands spent decades denying the dangers of asbestos in its talc products.

Johnson & Johnson insists its talcum powder is asbestos-free and does not cause cancer. However, internal documents revealed through litigation and brought to light in Harris’s book and in mesothelioma lawsuits, tell a different story, one where brand protection took priority over public safety.

In an April 2025 interview with NPR, Harris put it bluntly:

“This company did something terrible. And they did it for decades. And they did it knowing what they were doing.”

For individuals and families affected by illnesses caused by asbestos in talc products, the details in this book are not only alarming, they’re also familiar. And for those still waiting for justice, it offers something else: hope and momentum.

J&J’s Knowledge of Asbestos in Talc Products Dates Back to the 1950s

According to Harris’s reporting, Johnson & Johnson was aware as early as the 1950s that some of its talc tested positive for asbestos. But instead of warning the public or removing the product, J&J spent decades managing the message. That meant downplaying internal findings, pressuring regulators, and even reshaping testing standards to avoid triggering red flags.

This wasn’t a lapse in judgment. It was a calculated decision that put millions of people at risk

Mesothelioma Lawsuits Reveal the Human Cost of Asbestos Exposure 

Mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer, has one known cause: asbestos exposure. It is the respiratory disease most closely associated with asbestos.

That makes this even more tragic. This disease isn’t random. And in many of these cases, it was caused by a product people trusted and used without warning of the risk of asbestos in talc.

Talc and asbestos often occur together in the earth, making proper testing and screening essential. When companies fail to do that or worse, try to manipulate the process, they endanger the people who rely on them.

Dodging Mesothelioma Lawsuits Accountability 

As cancer and mesothelioma lawsuits mounted, J&J refused to admit fault or offer settlements. Instead, it turned to a controversial tactic known as the “Texas Two-Step,” shifting its talc liabilities to a newly created subsidiary, which then filed for bankruptcy to freeze litigation.

The move temporarily froze tens of thousands of lawsuits, including one filed by Rick, a plaintiff featured by NPR. His case, like so many others, was put on hold while Johnson & Johnson attempted to shield itself from accountability. As Harris explained:

“His lawsuit is one of 93,000 that were frozen by the many bankruptcy filings that Johnson & Johnson has filed. It will now advance because… that last bankruptcy filing was thrown out by a federal judge just last week. So, Rick is waiting for his day in court.”

That decision marks a turning point for the thousands of others whose cases regarding asbestos in talc have been stalled for years. For the first time in a long time, justice no longer feels out of reach.

Regulatory Gaps Enabled the Asbestos Exposure Crisis

No More Tears highlights the limited authority of federal regulators over products like baby powder. The FDA’s cosmetics division lacked the power to mandate safety testing or enforce product recalls, leaving companies like Johnson & Johnson to self-regulate. As Harris noted in his NPR interview:

“The cosmetic office has almost no funding… So those standards are essentially that companies must test these things themselves and report back to the FDA if any of those test results are concerning.”

With no meaningful oversight, J&J was free to do what it wanted, and the public paid the price. This lack of enforcement allowed dangerous products to stay on the market for decades, while the risks remained hidden from consumers.

Momentum Builds for Justice for Asbestos in Talc 

Rick’s story represents thousands of people who’ve battled cancer as well as families who’ve lost loved ones and victims who trusted a product they never imagined could cause harm.

The truth is no longer buried. The courts are paying attention. And Johnson & Johnson is running out of places to hide.

If you or someone you love was diagnosed with mesothelioma after using talc-based products, this is your moment to be heard.

Signs and Symptoms of Mesothelioma:

  • Persistent Chest or Abdominal Pain – Ongoing discomfort in the chest or stomach area that doesn’t go away, often mistaken for less serious conditions.
  • Shortness of Breath – Difficulty breathing or feeling winded, commonly caused by fluid buildup around the lungs (pleural effusion).
  • Unexplained Weight Loss – Significant loss of weight without changes in diet or activity, often a warning sign of serious illness.
  • Fatigue and Weakness – Ongoing tiredness and reduced energy levels that interfere with daily activities.

How We Help Victims of Asbestos Exposure

Seek justice with the help of our experienced asbestos attorneys. Our asbestos law firm has represented individuals like you affected by asbestos exposure for decades, fighting the corporate giants responsible for their dangerous products. If you or a loved one were exposed to asbestos or suffered from a disease caused by asbestos, like mesothelioma, we can help.

Our Results

$880 million award

Historic settlement for over 1,300 survivors of clergy and adult abuse within the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles, marking a pivotal moment for justice.

READ THE DETAILS

$725.5 million award

A Philadelphia jury awarded a record verdict against ExxonMobil for failing to warn about cancer risks due to benzene in its petroleum products.

READ THE DETAILS

$25 million award

Private equity firm and co-defendants agree to pay $25M in Medicaid fraud case alleging mental health services provided by unqualified providers.

READ THE DETAILS