We work with whistleblowers to expose fraud against the government.

Improper Cost Allocation

Defense contractors that knowingly bill direct costs for nongovernmental projects, such as labor and materials, to cost pools for federal projects are committing fraud.

What if you contracted to have work performed for your home or business but discovered that your contractor billed you for work that he actually performed for someone else or for unrelated business development expenses? You would either refuse to pay the invoice or, if you discover the fraud after you paid the bill, you would demand repayment and possibly take legal action if necessary.

Unfortunately, this hypothetical situation is not unlike the sort of fraudulent activities that some defense contractors commit when billing the federal government. Because military defense contracts are typically in the millions of dollars and involve complex accounting practices, contractors sometimes try to pass off costs to the government that they or their subcontractors should either absorb as the cost of doing business or bill to nongovernmental projects.

Taxpayers have the right to expect defense contractors to follow the rules and not bill the government for expenses that are not related to defense contracts. For this reason, contractors are required by law to follow certain accounting procedures and are prohibited from seeking reimbursement for certain types of costs.

Whistleblowers who are privy to contractors who violate these accounting practices can help the government recover taxpayer monies by pursuing a False Claims Act case. For their role in helping to recoup government funds and maintaining the integrity of federal defense programs, they may also be entitled to a share of the recovery.

Lockheed Martin pays $10.28 million to settle False Claims Act inflated billing case

Lockheed Martin Corporation, the world’s largest defense contractor, in 2010 settled a False Claims Act case with the U.S. government for $10.28 million. The claims were based on allegations that between 1996 and 2000, the defense contractor’s aircraft manufacturing division in Marietta, Georgia, inflated the overhead rates it charged to government contracts to cover charges related to a separate commercial contract with another company.

According to the allegations in the lawsuit, Lockheed Martin mischarged the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy for costs that were, in reality, tied to a commercial contract that the company had with an Italian aerospace company. Lockheed allegedly charged the cost of business development, proposal costs, and other selling costs related to the commercial contract to cost accounts for contracts with the U.S. government.

Raytheon pays $2.7 million to settle claims that it mischarged marketing costs to the U.S. government

Raytheon Company, one of the largest defense contractors in the U.S., settled claims with the U.S. government in 1998 for $2.7 million. The lawsuit alleged that Raytheon mischarged the U.S. government for costs related to marketing products to foreign governments.

The Cost Accounting Standards of the Federal Acquisition Regulations require that the allocation of foreign marketing costs, like those of Raytheon’s, be billed to contracts between the contractor and foreign customers. Domestic marketing costs, under the regulations, are to be allocated to U.S. government contracts.

The lawsuit asserted that Raytheon violated the regulations by improperly classifying the costs of the company’s foreign marketing activities as “division administration,” thus impermissibly allocating the costs to U.S. government contracts.

Whistleblowers can help expose such illegal accounting practices. Whistleblowers who are aware of contractors who engage in improper accounting practices in order to illegally bill the government for costs to which they are not entitled can help stop such fraud by filing False Claims Act cases. Individuals who step forward to bring such wrongdoing to light help save taxpayer dollars and ensure that monies allocated for the military are used as intended.

How Waters Kraus Paul & Siegel can help whistleblowers

With a national presence and in-depth experience fighting fraud against the government, Waters Kraus Paul & Siegel, LLP, provides aggressive representation of whistleblowers in qui tam actions and related complaints. The firm currently represents whistleblowers seeking to recover funds on behalf of the federal and state governments in a variety of cases, which may involve defendants such as large pharmaceutical companies, government contractors, school district contractors, and hospice and nursing home care providers.

To learn more about qui tam representation at Waters Kraus Paul & Siegel, or to have one of our attorneys review your potential case, email us or call 800.226.9880.

What is Qui Tam?

Under the Federal False Claims Act (FCA), whistleblowers have the power to save taxpayers billions of dollars each year by taking a stand against fraud. The U.S. False Claims Act allows private citizens to file suits on the government’s behalf when the government has been defrauded through any federally funded contract or program. The qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act allow these citizens to recover damages. A number of states and the city of Chicago also have laws similar to the False Claims Act to protect against fraud. To learn more about the different types of fraud … READ MORE

WKPS Lawyers Block Boeing from Dismissing Workers’ Birth Defect Claims

June 11, 2024 An article published by Law360 highlights the work of Waters Kraus Paul & Siegel attorneys who secured a closely watched ruling on behalf of Boeing manufacturing plant employees seeking to hold the company accountable for birth injuries caused by exposure…

Three from Waters Kraus Paul & Siegel recognized by Super Lawyers Rising Stars

June 13, 2024 Waters Kraus Paul & Siegel is proud to announce that firm attorneys Chris Johnson, Caitlyn Silhan and Camille Hunt have been honored among the nation’s top lawyers under 40 by Thomson Reuters’ 2024 “Super Lawyers – Rising Stars.” Each year, Super Lawyers conducts a rigorous selection process designed to identify outstanding early and mid-career lawyers in each state. Attorneys practicing in more than 70 practice areas are selected based on peer nominations and a rigorous vetting process designed to recognize the top 2.5 percent of practicing lawyers under age 40 or who have been in practice fewer than 10 years.…

What are my chances?

That’s the first question everyone asks. The truth is it’s impossible to know. But we can tell you this. Waters Kraus Paul & Siegel has what it takes to fight against big corporate interests and win. That’s why we’ve taken more mesothelioma trials to verdict than any other firm. And that’s why we’ve recovered more than $1.3 billion for clients like you. Do you think you have a case? Contact us now to speak with an attorney.

Call 800.226.9880