July 22, 2026
A federal jury verdict in Arizona has drawn attention to the growing number of Uber sexual assault lawsuit claims nationwide. In the landmark case, the jury found Uber Technologies Inc. responsible for a 2023 assault committed by one of its drivers, awarding the victim $8.5 million in damages.
Uber faces mounting scrutiny across the country as lawmakers, investors and others seek to hold the company accountable for a pattern of Uber sexual assault during rides. The court’s decision also could shape how courts evaluate corporate responsibility in cases involving Uber sexual assault and similar allegations across the rideshare industry.
Because Uber drivers are categorized as contractors rather than company employees, the ride-share platform has long maintained it is not liable for their misconduct. But jurors ultimately found Uber liable under a legal theory known as “apparent agency,” concluding that the driver was acting on behalf of the company at the time of the Uber sexual assault.
The verdict establishes an example for future Uber sex assault trials. Uber said it plans to appeal.
The case is one of more than 3,000 federal lawsuits alleging Uber drivers’ sexual assaults that have been consolidated in the Northern District of California. The company also faces more than 500 Uber sexual assault lawsuits in California state court.
A New York Times investigation found Uber received a report of sexual assault or sexual misconduct in the United States almost every eight minutes on average between 2017 and 2022, which is far more than what the company has publicly disclosed. However, despite knowledge of Uber sexual assaults, Uber executives prioritized expanding the business over rider safety.
On the same day as the Arizona verdict, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated 17 sexual assault lawsuits against Lyft Inc. into a new MDL in the Northern District of California.
The Lyft plaintiffs also claim the company knew how prevalent sexual assault was but failed to take adequate steps to prevent it.
Plaintiffs in Uber sexual assault lawsuit cases typically argue that rideshare companies failed to adequately protect passengers. Those allegations include:
These claims often focus on whether companies like Uber should be treated as technology platforms or as service providers with a duty to ensure passenger safety and prevent sexual assault.
Sexual assault victims can suffer for decades after the crime occurs. Many child and adult victims of sex abuse were failed by institutions they trusted to keep them safe from this horrific crime.
How We Help Sex Abuse Victims
Our national sexual abuse lawyers work one-on-one with survivors, offering a direct, personal level of care and discretion. We use our decades of experience battling big organizations to fight on behalf of survivors, aggressively taking on those responsible for causing pain and suffering. If you are a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, we can help.
Our Results
Historic settlement for over 1,300 survivors of clergy and adult abuse within the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles, marking a pivotal moment for justice.
A Philadelphia jury awarded a record verdict against ExxonMobil for failing to warn about cancer risks due to benzene in its petroleum products.
Private equity firm and co-defendants agree to pay $25M in Medicaid fraud case alleging mental health services provided by unqualified providers.
That’s the first question everyone asks. The truth is it’s impossible to know. But we can tell you this. Waters Kraus Paul & Siegel has what it takes to fight against big corporate interests and win.
